26 July 2006
|
Economic and Social Council
ECOSOC/6236 |
|
|
Department of Public Information · News and Media Division · New York |
Economic and social council ADOPTS TEXTS ON SOCIAl, HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES
Holds General Discussion on Social,
Human Rights Issues, Takes Note of a Number of United Nations Agency Reports
Documentation
A report (E/2006/11), entitled letter dated 30 June 2005 from the Director-General of the International Labour Organization
addressed to the Secretary-General, contains the conclusions of the
Special Sitting of the Committee on the Application of Standards of the
International Labour Conference concerning the observance by the
Government of Myanmar of the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29).
These conclusions were endorsed by the International Labour Conference
on 16 June 2005.
General Discussion
Canada
commended the International Labour Organization (ILO) for its patient
and persistent work in regard to the problem of forced labour in “
Burma”. Canada had watched with growing unease the unfavourable
developments that had been unfolding in “ Burma” with respect to forced
labour, and this was part of a long-standing and comprehensive policy
that “Burmese” authorities had taken which undermined human rights.
The ILO was in the front line in working to ensure that “Burma” lived
up to its commitments, and had been consistently confronted with
violations of human rights that showed how closely related these
fundamental rights issues were.
NYUNT MAUNG SHEIN ( Myanmar)
said that the issue under discussion should be appropriately addressed
within the International Labour Organization (ILO). The individuals
named in the report on the situation of forced labour in Myanmar had in
fact been released. The Government had also taken further measures with
regard to forced labour. It was also willing to collaborate and
cooperate with ILO concerning the issue of forced labour. His county’s
name was registered with the United Nations as Myanmar and not as Burma.
VIJAY TRIVEDI (India)
said since the conclusion of the ninety-fifth session of the Labour
Conference, it had been conveyed that the Government of Myanmar had
released a prisoner, and the consultations between the ILO and the
Government on a mutually agreed mechanism to eliminate forced labour
was in progress. Consultations had begun and would continue. These
developments were important steps towards eradicating the practice of
force labour. In order to move the process forward, the cooperation
extended by Myanmar should be encouraged. The efforts of the
Director-General of the ILO should be commended. India was strongly
opposed to the practice of forced labour, and supported the process of
dialogue and cooperation between the ILO and Myanmar.
TERRY MILLER ( United States)
said the practice of forced labour in “ Burma”, with the complicity of
the regime, was a violation of the ILO Conventions. The United States
had consistently supported the active engagement of the ILO and its
efforts to bring an end to the practice of forced labour in “ Burma”,
and to move the country away from this practice. The conclusions of
the recent International Labour Conference, and the six-month
moratorium on the complaints of those complaining should be made
permanent. The country should engage with the ILO in a mechanism that
allowed complaints to be acted on, and that ensured that those
complaining would be free from retribution. Other measures should be
taken if the authorities did not take steps to bring an end to forced
labour.
SHIGERU ENDO ( Japan)
said Japan deemed it a positive sign that the Myanmar Government
recently released Aye Myint, following the release of Su Su Nwe. It
also understood that a six-month moratorium on prosecutions had been
duly implemented. While these actions were positive, the situation was
still far from satisfactory. The core issue was the establishment of a
credible mechanism that dealt with complaints on forced labour by the
end of October. The Myanmar Government should promptly conduct sincere
negotiations with the ILO and reach an agreement on the establishment
of the mechanism, including the strengthening of the liaison office, as
requested by the ILO. The ultimate goal was to realise the total
eradication of forced labour, and to this end the international
community should remain seized of this matter so that the Myanmar
Government would take concrete action.
ANDALIB ELIAS ( Bangladesh)
said the issue of observance of the situation of forced labour by the
International Labour Organization (ILO) with regard to Myanmar had been
already discussed and Myanmar had responded, saying it would cooperate
with the ILO.
ANDREI MOLTCHAN ( Belarus)
said as a member of the ILO Council, Belarus had been keeping a close
watch on the implementation of the Convention by Myanmar. Belarus
condemned all forms of forced labour, and was examining the situation.
The various efforts deployed by the ILO were welcomed. There was a
will by the Government of Myanmar to establish a constructive dialogue
on the issue, and to implement the recommendations drafted by the
International Labour Conference in June. The representative of Myanmar
was thanked for the information on the efforts taken to eliminate the
various incidents of forced labour. It was only through mutual
cooperation and respect that results would be achieved
The
Council should help the ILO and the Government of Myanmar to further
the dialogue to solve this serious problem that should not exist in
today’s world.
GUSTI AGUNG WESAKA PUJA ( Indonesia)
welcomed the conclusion adopted by the ninety-fifth session of the
International Labour Conference to give the Government of Myanmar the
opportunity to continue the dialogue with the ILO in order to find a
mutually acceptable solution in addressing the issue of forced labour.
He also noted the Government of Myanmar’s decision and actions to
implement the recommendations of the session.
LIU ZHONGXIN ( China)
said the information provided on the situation in Myanmar by the
Ambassador was appreciated. About one month ago, the ILO had an
in-depth discussion on the issue, and the Government of Myanmar, in a
spirit of cooperation, responded to the ILO effort and had made
progress in certain areas. In view of the above, China believed the
Council should support the Myanmar Government in continuing its
cooperation with the ILO, and continue to discuss the framework of
cooperation.
MARIA DEL CARMEN HERREA CASEIRO ( Cuba)
said on social development, it went without saying that Cuba denounced
any and all forms of forced labour. In the room it had been heard that
the compliance with the ILO Convention No. 29 had been discussed in
depth within the framework of the ILO, and therefore in the view of
Cuba, when it came to discussing the technical aspects, this was not the
right place to engage in this discussion, as it had already been held
within the framework of the ILO one month earlier. The Government of
Myanmar was working towards improving the situation and adopting
measures in close cooperation with the various mechanisms of the ILO.
This theme should remain within the framework of the ILO, as a
specialised body, when it came to dealing with such issues. Work
should be done to further dialogue and cooperation between Myanmar and
the ILO in order to achieve an improved labour situation.
JARL-HAKAN ROSENGREN (Finland),
speaking on behalf of the European Union, said that in recent years,
the human rights situation of Myanmar, including the issue of forced
labour, had been addressed in a number of fora. The European Union was
deeply concerned by the information provided by the Special Rapporteur
on the situation of human rights in Myanmar. Myanmar continued to
implement widespread and systematic forced labour practices, including
forced recruitment throughout the country. There was evidence of child
labour, including forced recruitment of child soldiers. It was deeply
regrettable that citizens were obliged to be state actors to dedicate
themselves without pay to exploitative activities. The European Union
encouraged the authorities in Myanmar to introduce reforms to meet its
obligations under the ILO Convention concerning forced or compulsory
labour. The European Union had consistently expressed the view that
prosecuting persons who lodged complaints against the exaction of
forced labour and tried to obtain redress was unacceptable and should
stop immediately.
ASAD M. KHAN (Pakistan)
said the delegation of Pakistan denounced forced labour in all its
manifestations. Pakistan appreciated the ongoing dialogue between
Myanmar and the ILO and hoped that the discussion would bear fruit.
ANNA BIONDI BIRD, of International Confederation Free Trade Unions,
said the Confederation wished to express its severe and grave concern
on the human and workers’ rights violations in Myanmar. The
initiatives taken by the ILO were all aimed to bring the military junta
to finally implement the recommendations of the ILO Commission of
Inquiry, therefore discontinuing the use of forced labour in the
country, while ensuring that no action was taken against victims and
their representatives who complained to the courts or to the ILO. The
authorities’ total lack
of
commitment was clearly expressed in the realities on the ground. While
the situation was still very worrisome, a renewed pressure on the junta
coming from international and regional actors encouraged the
Confederation.
* *** *
For information media · not an official record