12/31/1995
Letter from Burma n.6. Prison Walls affect thorse on the outside, too
This
is one of a yearlong series of letters, the Japanese translation of
which appears in the Mainichi Shimbun the same day, or the previous day
in some areas.
Letter from Burma (No. 6)
by Aung San Suu Kyi
Mainichi Daily News
Sunday, December 31, 1995
PRISON WALLS AFFECT THOSE ON THE OUTSIDE, TOO
"Young Birds Outside Cages"
There
is a well-known book by Ludu U Hla, one of the foremost literary
figures of modern Burma, about the heart-rending fate of young
prisoners. The title of this book translates literally as Caged Young
Birds or Young Birds Inside Cages. During the last seven years many
young people have been put into the prisons of Burma for their part in
the democracy movement. But it is not about them that I would like to
write today, it is about the other young people, those who are left
outside when one, or in a few cases both, of their parents are
imprisoned for their political beliefs.
êThroughout the years of my house
arrest my family was living in a freed society and I could rest assures
that they were economically secure and safe from any kind of
persecution. The vast majority of my colleagues who were imprisoned did
not have the comfort of such an assurance. They knew well that their
families were in an extremely vulnerable position, in constant danger
of interrogations, house searches, general harassment and interference
with their means of livelihood. For those prisoners with young children
it was particularly difficult.
In Burma those who are held
to endanger state security can be arrested under a section of the law
that allows detention without trials for a maximum period of three
years. And prisoners who have not been tried are not entitled to visits
from their families. A number of political prisoners who were placed in
jail for their part in the democracy movement were kept without trial
for more than two years. For more than two years they did not see their
families at all. Only after they were tried and sentenced were they
allowed family visits: these visits, permitted once a fortnight, lasted
for a mere 15 minutes at a time.
Two years is a long time in
the life of a child. It is long enough to forget a parent who has
vanished from sight. It is long enough for boys and girls to grow up
into young adolescents. It is long enough to turn a carefree youngster
into a troubled human being. Fifteen minutes once a fortnight is not
enough to reverse the effects on a child of the sudden absence of one
of the two people to whom it has habitually looked for protection and
guidance. Nor is it enough to bridge the gap created by a long
separation.
A political prisoner failed
to recognize in the teen-ager who came to see him on the first family
visit after more than two years in detention the young son he had left
behind. It was a situation that was familiar to me. When I saw my
younger son again for the first time after a separation of two years
and seven months he had changed from a round faced
not-quite-12-year-old into a rather stylish "cool' teen-ager. If I had
met him in the street I would not have known him for my little son.
Political prisoners have to
speak to their families through a double barrier of iron grating and
wire netting so that no physical contact is possible. The children of
one political prisoner would make small holes in the netting and push
their fingers through to touch their father. When the holes got visibly
large the jail authorities had them patched up with thin sheets of tin.
The children would start all over again trying to bore a hole through
to their father: it is not the kind of activity one would wish for any
child.
I was not the only woman
political detainee in Burma: there have been -- and their still remain
-- a number of other women imprisoned for their political beliefs. Some
of these women had young children who suddenly found themselves in the
care of fathers worried sick for their wives and totally unused to
running a household. Most of the children, except for those who were
too young to understand what was going on, suffered from varying
degrees of stress.
Some children who went to
elitist schools found that their schoolmates avoided them and that even
teachers treated them with a certain reserve: it did not do to
demonstrate sympathy for the offspring of political prisoners and it
was considered particularly shocking if the prisoner was a woman. Some
children were never taken on visits to prison as it was thought the
experience would be too traumatic for them so for years they were
totally deprived of all contact with their mothers. Some children who
needed to be reassured that their mothers still existed would be taken
on a visit to the prison only to be deeply disturbed by the sight of
their mothers looking wan and strange in their white jail garb.
When the parents are released
from prison it is still not the end of the story. The children suffer
from a gnawing anxiety that their fathers and mothers might once again
be taken away and placed out of their reach behind several barriers of
brick and iron. They have known what it is like to be young birds
fluttering helplessly outside the cages that shut their parents away
from them. They know that there will be security for their families as
long as freedom of thought and freedom of political action are not
guaranteed by the law of the land.